Enforcement Actions - G

Using the first letter of the individual’s last name, select the letter group below that corresponds. This will display enforcement actions for the corresponding letter group.


A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Each page of the Enforcement Actions section is divided into subsections for citations, administrative actions, and convictions. You should check each subsection to see if an enforcement action has been taken against the individual you are seeking.

Citations

Craig A. Gambill

Tustin—The Board issued a one-count citation that included a $500 administrative fine to Craig A. Gambill, architect license number C-27164, for alleged violations of BPC 5600.05(a)(1) and (b) (License Renewal Process; Audit; False or Misleading Information on Coursework on Disability Access Requirements). The action alleged that Gambill certified false or misleading information on his 2013 License Renewal Application and failed to make records of completion of the required coursework available to the Board for auditing upon request. Gambill paid the fine, satisfying the citation. The citation became final on August 27, 2015.

Michael John Gannon

Santee—The Board issued a one-count citation that included a $500 administrative fine to Michael John Gannon, architect license number C-14279, for an alleged violation of Business and Professions Code section 5600.05(a)(1) (License Renewal Process; Conditions; Certifications; Audit; False or Misleading Information; Disciplinary Action; Coursework Regarding Disability Access, and Zero Net Carbon Design Requirements; Submission of Letter to Legislature). The action alleged that Gannon certified false or misleading information on his 2023 License Renewal Application. Gannon paid the fine, satisfying the citation. The citation became final on May 14, 2024.

John R. Garakian

Laguna Beach—The Board issued a one-count citation that included a $500 administrative fine to John R. Garakian, architect license number C-9826, for an alleged violation of Business and Professions Code section 5600.05(a)(1) (License Renewal Process; Audit; False or Misleading Information on Coursework on Disability Access Requirements). The action alleged that Garakian certified false or misleading information on his 2019 License Renewal Application. Garakian paid the fine, satisfying the citation. The citation became final on February 24, 2020.

Rodolfo Garces

Palmdale—The Board issued a one-count citation that included a $2,000 administrative fine to Rodolfo Garces, dba Affordable Blueprints Inc., ADS Architecture Group, and Affordable Drafting Services, an unlicensed individual, for alleged violations of Business and Professions Code section 5536(a) (Practice Without License or Holding Self Out as Architect). The action alleged that Garces’ Buzzfile and LinkedIn profiles described him as providing “architecture” and “architectural” services. Further, his company’s Manta, ProMatcher, and Yelp profiles used the terms “architects,” “architecture,” and “architectural” in ADS Architecture Group and Affordable Drafting Services’ description of services, without an architect who is in management control of the services that are offered and provided by the business entity and either the owner, a part-owner, an officer, or an employee of the business entity. The citation became final on March 1, 2020.

Palmdale—The Board issued a two-count citation that included a $4,000 administrative fine to Rodolfo Garces, aka Rudy Garces and dba AAA Architectural Designs, ADS Architecture Group, and Affordable Drafting Services, an unlicensed individual, for alleged violations of BPC 5536(a) (Practice Without License or Holding Self Out as Architect) and California Code of Regulations section (CCR) 134(a) (Use of the Term Architect). The action alleged that on or about December 9, 2014, Garces provided a client with an "Architectural Proposal" offering to "Create and complete architectural plans for a residential 2nd floor room addition" to an existing single-family residence located in Fullerton, California. The proposal was on "ADS Architecture Group" letterhead, included "all architectural designs/plans and structural engineering (drawings and calculations) necessary for city submittal," and referenced his business’ "architectural" and "architectural design" departments. In addition, on or about March 3, 2015, Garces provided a client with an "Architectural Proposal" offering to "Create/complete architectural tentant (sic) improvement plans for an existing 1500 sq. ft. commercial building" located in Lancaster, California. The proposal was on ADS Architecture Group" letterhead, identified Garces as an "Architect," included "architectural plans" in the services he would provide, and referenced his "Architectural Hourly Fees" and his business’ "architectural" and "architectural design" departments. Garces subsequently invoiced the client through his PayPal account under the business name "ADS Architecture Group" for an "Architectural Services Retainer," an "Architectural Services 50% Set," and "Completed Architectural Plans." Furthermore, on or about August 25, 2016, Garces: identified himself as a "project architect"; described his business as an "Affordable Architect," "architecture firm," and "architecture practice"; used the email address "affordablearchitect1@gmail.com" and the username "@LA.Architecture"; described his services as "Architectural," "Architects," and "Architecture"; used the terms "licensed" and "California Architect License" and the fictitious license number "CA856467"; and listed his businesses under the headings "Architect," "Architectural Designers," "Architectural Services," "Architects," "Architects & Builders Services," and "Architecture," in his Facebook profile and advertisements on the Internet at ads-architecturegroup.com, angieslist.com, buzzfile.com, groupon.com, houzz.com, losangeles.craigslist.org, manta.com, merchantcircle.com, promatcher.com, yellowpages.com, and yelp.com. Garces also used the business names "AAA Architectural Designs" and "ADS Architecture Group" without a California licensed architect who is in management control of the professional services that are offered and provided by the business entities and either the owner, a part-owner, an officer, or an employee of the business entities. The citation became final on December 7, 2016.

Roi Gavriely

Canoga Park—The Board issued a one-count citation that included a $1,000 administrative fine to Roi Gavriely, dba Loyalty Construction, Inc., an unlicensed individual, for alleged violations of Business and Professions Code section 5536(a) (Practice Without License or Holding Self Out as Architect). The action alleged that Gavriely’s company print advertisement, company website, and Angie’s List profile described him as providing “architectural” services and offering “architects” without an architect who is in management control of the services that are offered and provided by the business entity and either the owner, a part-owner, an officer, or an employee of the business entity. The citation became final on February 13, 2020.

Mark Allen Gaxiola

Eureka—The Board issued a one-count citation that included a $500 administrative fine to Mark Allen Gaxiola, architect license number C-23899, for an alleged violation of Business and Professions Code section 5536.22(a) (Written Contract).

The action alleged that on or about January 17, 2019, Gaxiola provided a contract to a client to develop preliminary design documents to upgrade an existing lodge for the project located in Dinsmore, California for a fixed fee of $10,000. The client signed the contract and provided Gaxiola with an initial payment of $2,500. The contract did not include Gaxiola’s license number, a description of the procedure for accommodating additional services, or a termination clause for the above-referenced project. In an invoice to the client dated April 22, 2019, Gaxiola billed $1,410 but did not provide a description of services or tasks provided, and this led to a dispute over the fees.

Gaxiola’s failure to include in the written contract his license number, a description of the procedure that he and the client would use to accommodate additional services, and a description of the procedure to be used by either party to terminate the contract constituted a violation of Business and Professions Code section 5536.22(a). Mr. Gaxiola paid the fine, satisfying the citation. The citation became final on October 22, 2020.

Markus Hans Geisler

Albany—The Board issued a two-count citation that included a $1,500 administrative fine to Markus Hans Geisler, architect license number C-16933, for alleged violations of BPC 5600.05(a)(1) (License Renewal Process; Audit; False or Misleading Information on Coursework on Disability Access Requirements) and CCR 160(b)(2) (Rules of Professional Conduct). The action alleged that Geisler failed to provide documentation to the Board from the course provider upon an audit of his 2013 License Renewal Application and failed to respond to the Board’s requests for information within 30 days in regards to an investigation. The citation became final on November 25, 2015.

Julio C. Gener

Costa Mesa—The Board issued a one-count citation that included a $500 administrative fine to Julio C. Gener, architect license number C-20599, for a violation of Business and Professions Code section 5536.22(a) (Written Contract).

On or about August 18, 2017, Gener entered into a contract with a client to obtain a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for an auto display and gun range located in the city of Huntington Beach. This contract's scope was to create as-built plans to get the project approved for a CUP and provide production plans, which excluded any additional design or engineering. The CUP was obtained from the City of Huntington Beach on or about February 1, 2018. On or about March 2, 2018, Gener submitted construction documents for the project remodel to the city of Huntington Beach for plan check approval and feedback. These documents were dated February 7, 2018, and included a new restroom, kitchen, and parking layout.

On or about March 6, 2018, after submitting the preliminary drawings to the city, Gener emailed the client a written contract "memorializing" their oral amendment to the initial contract, but the client never signed it.

A dispute arose regarding the timeline and Gener was terminated from the project on or about March 23, 2018. Gener had worked on the project without an executed contract until his termination, a violation of Business and Professions Code section 5536.22(a). Gener paid the fine, satisfying the citation. The citation became final on July 24, 2020.

Michael Edward Genshock

Phelan—The Board issued a two-count citation that included a $750 administrative fine to Michael Edward Genshock, architect license number C-17282, for alleged violations of Business and Professions Code section (BPC) 5600.05(a)(1) (License Renewal Process; Audit; False or Misleading Information on Coursework on Disability Access Requirements) and California Code of Regulations section (CCR) 160(b)(2) (Rules of Professional Conduct). The action alleged that Genshock certified false or misleading information on his 2013 License Renewal Application and failed to respond to the Board’s requests for information within 30 days in regards to an investigation. The citation became final on November 3, 2016.

Eran Gispan

Sherman Oaks—The Board issued a one-count citation that included a $1,500 administrative fine to Eran Gispan, dba NE Designs, Inc., an unlicensed individual, for alleged violations of BPC section 5536.1(c) (Signature and Stamp on Plans and Documents; Unauthorized Practice; Misdemeanor). The action alleged that Gispan prepared plans for a four-story residence, not a two-story as agreed upon, and the plans were not stamped by a licensed professional. The plans prepared by Gispan indicated four distinct living levels in the house, which is not a building exempt from the requirements of the Architects Practice Act pursuant to BPC sections 5537(a) and 5538, constituting the practice of architecture as defined in BPC section 5500.1. Gispan paid the fine, satisfying the citation. The citation became final on May 10, 2019.

Scott J. Glass

Brooklyn, New York—The Board issued a one-count citation that included a $500 administrative fine to Scott J. Glass, architect license number C-31542, for an alleged violation of BPC section 5600.05(a)(1) (License Renewal Process; Audit; False or Misleading Information on Coursework on Disability Access Requirements). The action alleged that Glass certified false or misleading information on his 2018 License Renewal Application. Glass paid the fine, satisfying the citation. The citation became final on September 14, 2018.

Andrew Paul Goetz

Corona del Mar—The Board issued a one-count citation that included a $1,000 administrative fine to Andrew Paul Goetz, architect license number C-18499, for an alleged violation of BPC 5579 (Fraud in Obtaining a License). The action alleged that Goetz submitted a false statement under penalty of perjury on his 2015 License Renewal Application when he answered "no" to the question, "In the preceding renewal period, have you been disciplined by a public agency or have you been convicted of a crime in any state, the USA and its territories, federal jurisdiction, military court, or other country, which involved a plea or verdict of guilty or a conviction following a plea of nolo contendere?" On or about February 5, 2014, a Decision of an Administrative Law Judge became effective, denying his application for a California Real Estate Salesperson License, but gave him the right to a restricted license. This was based on the Statement of Issues filed against Goetz by the Bureau of Real Estate on August 21, 2013, centering on Goetz’s conviction on or about February 29, 1984 for theft by use of credit card and his conviction on or about January 21, 2005 for violating 13 counts of falsifying records. Goetz paid the fine, satisfying the citation. The citation became final on October 6, 2016.

Brendan David Goggins

San Jose—The Board issued a one-count citation, including an administrative find in the amount of $1,000 to Brendan David Goggins, architect license number C-36377, for alleged violations of Business and Professions Code sections 5536.22(a)(6), 5536.22(a)(7), and 5536.22(a)(8) (Written Contract).

On or around March 30, 2023, Goggins provided a written contract to Ms. A.Y. for a tenant improvement project located in Menlo Park, California. The contract scope included construction drawings for demolition and to obtain a building permit for a fixed fee of $6,400.

Goggins failed to include: his name, address, and license number, the name and address of his client, the project address, a description of the procedure to be used by either party to terminate the contract, a statement identifying the ownership and use of instruments of service, and a statement in at least 12-point type that reads: “Architects are licensed and regulated by the California Architects Board located at 2420 Del Paso Road, Suite 105, Sacramento, CA 95834.” in the written contract for the above-referenced project, in violation of Business and Professions Code sections 5536.22(a)(4), (6), (7), and (8). Goggins paid the fine, satisfying the citation. The citation became final on June 8, 2024.

Sebastian Rey Gonzalez

San Diego—The Board issued a one-count citation that included a $1,000 administrative fine to Sebastian Rey Gonzalez, dba S3DA Design, an unlicensed individual, for alleged violations of Business and Professions Code section 5536(a) (Practice Without License or Holding Self Out as Architect). The action alleged Gonzalez described himself in advertising as an “Architect” and described the company, S3DA Design, as an “architectural design firm” that provides “architectural services” on the company website. Gonzalez’s company Facebook profile categorized him as an “Architectural Designer” and listed “Architectural Design” under Services. Gonzalez’s company Upwork profile described the company as providing “Architectural and Interior designing- Structural engineering” and stated, “Our professional engineers and architects have years of experience in servicing many great clients. We are an architectural design, structural engineering, and interior design company” and “Feel free to contact us if you like to know more about our architectural and structural services.” The Upwork profile also included the words “Architecture” and “Interior Architecture” to describe the company’s services. Gonzalez’s company Yelp profile was categorized under “Architects.” Gonzalez’s company ZoomInfo profile described him as an “Architectural Designer.” Gonzalez used the terms “architectural” and “architecture” in S3DA Design’s description of services without an architect who was in management control of the services that were offered and provided by the business entity and either the owner, a part-owner, an officer, or an employee of the business entity, which violated Business and Professions Code section 5536(a), as defined in California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 134(a). Gonzalez paid the fine, satisfying the citation. The citation became final on May 14, 2020.

Ralph Harmer Goodell, III

Cathedral City—The Board issued a three-count citation that included a $2,250 administrative fine to Ralph Harmer Goodell III, architect license number C-10132, for alleged violations of BPC section 5558 (Mailing Address and Name and Address of Entity Through Which License Holder Provides Architectural Services; Filing Requirements), BPC section 5536.22(a)(5) (Written Contract), and California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 160(b)(2) (Rules of Professional Conduct; Willful Misconduct). The action alleged that Goodell failed to file a Business Entity Report Form, used contracts that did not include a description of the procedure to be used by either party to terminate the contract, and failed to respond to the Board’s requests for information regarding an investigation within 30 days. Goodell paid the fine, satisfying the citation. The citation became final on January 20, 2020.

Alan Marshall Grant

Los Angeles—The Board issued a two-count modified citation that included a $750 administrative fine to Alan Marshall Grant, architect license number C-20912, for alleged violations of BPC 5536.22(a)(3) and (4) (Written Contract) and CCR 160(f)(1) (Rules of Professional Conduct). The action alleged that Grant’s written contract to provide architectural and engineering services for a residential project was not executed by Grant and did not include Grant’s architect license number and a description of the procedure that he and the clients would use to accommodate additional services in the contract. In addition, Grant revised the construction drawings which materially altered the scope of the project by changing garage construction from masonry walls and steel framing with metal deck and concrete fill slab to poured-in-place concrete without first fully informing the clients and obtaining their consent in writing. Grant paid the fine, satisfying the citation. The citation became final on November 2, 2016.

Campbell Grey

Reseda —The Board issued a three-count citation with a $5,000 administrative fine to Campbell Grey, an unlicensed person, dba GreyCo Global LLC, for alleged violations of Business and Professions Code section 5536(a) (Misrepresentation; Practice Without License or Holding Self Out as Architect) and California Code of Regulations, title 16, sections 134(a) and (b) (Use of the Term Architect; Responsible Control Within a Business Entity).

On or about March 13, 2021, Grey entered into a contract with Mr. J.G. (Client) entitled “Contract for Architectural/Structural Design Services,” offered “Architectural/Structural Design” and “Architectural Design” services, and charged for “Architectural Design.” The contract signature line also referred to Grey as “Arch. Designer.”

Grey’s company website stated “consider us artist/architects/builders of your dreams.” His Houzz profile offered “architectural design” in the “SO CAL” area and was categorized under “Architects and Building Designers.” His Archinect profile listed “Architecture” as an Area of Specialization.

Grey designed plans for a four-story apartment building located in Valley Village, California, which was submitted to the Planning Department, with a description of the project stating: demolition of an existing one-family dwelling and construction of a four-story, four-unit townhouse style apartment.

Grey misrepresented himself as a licensed architect when he advertised, offered and charged for “architectural design,” and referred to himself as an architectural designer. He practiced architecture without a license by designing a building is not exempt from licensing requirements under Business and Professions Code section 5537. Such conduct constitutes violations of Business and Professions Code section 5536(a) and California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 134(a) and (b). The citation became final on March 5, 2024.

John P. Grounds

Washington, District of Columbia—The Board issued a one-count citation that included a $500 administrative fine to John P. Grounds, architect license number C-25848, for an alleged violation of Business and Professions Code section 5600.05(a)(1) (License Renewal Process; Audit; False or Misleading Information on Coursework on Disability Access Requirements). The action alleged that Grounds certified false or misleading information on his 2019 License Renewal Application. The citation became final on November 8, 2019.

Jesus Manuel "Jesse" Guardado

Los Angeles—The Board issued a one-count citation that included a $1,000 administrative fine to Jesus Manuel "Jesse" Guardado, an unlicensed individual, for an alleged violation of Business and Professions Code section 5536(a) (Practice Without License or Holding Self Out as Architect). The action alleged that on or about February 26, 2016, Guardado presented his client with a "Proposal for Architectural and Engineering plans," which included the term "Architectural" to describe his company’s services, and offered "Architectural and Engineering services," "Architectural/Design" development, and structural analysis of the "architectural design." The citation became final on June 11, 2019.

Disciplinary Actions

Ronald Anthony Giddings

Alameda—Effective January 20, 2006, Ronald Anthony Giddings’ architect license number C-18887 was revoked. The action was the result of a Default Decision, which was adopted by the Board.

An Accusation was filed against Giddings for alleged violations of Business and Professions Code (BPC) sections 5583 (Fraud in Practice of Architecture) and 5584 (Willful Misconduct). The Accusation alleged that Giddings entered into a contract to provide architectural services for a residential addition and remodel. The subject received a retainer in the amount of $500 and two original drawings of the floor plan for the property. The subject failed to provide any architectural services on the project and failed to return the $500 retainer and original drawings. In another project, the subject entered into a contract to provide architectural services and secure permits related to a residential addition and remodel. The subject failed to provide the necessary plans for the project to enable the City of Alameda to issue permits to complete the project. The clients were required to hire another architect to complete the architectural plans at a cost of $4,289.55.

Andrew Paul Goetz

Newport Beach—Andrew Paul Goetz pled guilty to 13 felony counts in Orange County Superior Court, and was sentenced to 60 days in jail, three years of probation, and immediate surrender of his architect’s license, for forging or altering land surveys. The Board sought to revoke Goetz’s license after he admitted in January 2005 that he forged or altered land surveys on more than a dozen homes in Newport Beach. Goetz, who had been licensed in California as an architect since 1987, did not contest the revocation, which went into effect June 16, 2005 and has surrendered his license. The case was the result of an investigation by the Board and the Newport Beach Police Department.

Convictions

There are no convictions to display.